Thursday, December 3, 2009

Does anyone else think its a travesty that an NBA Finals game was decided by referees on a ticky tac

What ever happened to letting the players decide the game, on the court, not the foul line?



Does anyone else think its a travesty that an NBA Finals game was decided by referees on a ticky tack foul?nba league pass





they never would have called that minor foul that they called for wade if it had been dirk instead. The league "likes boys" and it prefers the heat.



Edit to idontkno-- wade was barely touched. so if you think he got hurt and that's why they called a foul, look again.



Does anyone else think its a travesty that an NBA Finals game was decided by referees on a ticky tack foul?nba tv ,nba teams



Ummm that's why the refs are there... to decide the game
I AGREE THE REFS SHOULD LET THEM PLAY MORE AND CALL LESS TICKI TACK FOULS
if josh howard didnt blow the free throws at the end the mavs would have won
Seems like allot of games these days or decided by the [ refs ].



No i don't like it.
it not footballs out there it not 1980s when they let stuff like that happen but to many player getting hurt so the game change
I see the question as whether the refs should allow a team or a player to break the rules of the game. I say change to rules to allow full contact, or enforce them as they exist.
Heck yeah!! I agree. I'm a fan of neither, myself, but come on! Darn refs!
I do. It sucked.
yes, yes, yes. that was barely a foul in the end...stupid referees.
yea it just showed that miami bribed the refs.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Fish